Braincast and the Blackberry, a combination made in heaven . . . | BlackberryGTD.com http://blackberrygtd.com/2007/09/05/braincast-and-the-blackberry-a-combination-made-in-heaven/ A site about Blackberry and GTD Sat, 19 May 2012 13:54:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 Braincast and the Blackberry, a combination made in heaven . . . | BlackberryGTD.com http://blackberrygtd.com/2007/09/05/braincast-and-the-blackberry-a-combination-made-in-heaven/#comment-21 Kerry Sat, 15 Sep 2007 03:25:56 +0000 http://blackberrygtd.com/2007/09/05/braincast-and-the-blackberry-a-combination-made-in-heaven/#comment-21 Being a jott user for quite some time and studying braincast, I can say it isn't really fair to compare the two when it comes to how it transcribes the voice. I can see how braincast can get better transcriptions because they have more time to get the trascriptions right being the person isn't at their computer when they send it in. With Jott, you are requesting a transcription of the voice to be sent not only to email, but to one's cell phone (or your own cell phone) and when doing so, it is more of an immediate command. Second of all, if a jott transcription does get botched up, there is the option to hear the audio from your phone or email. So regardless, there is a way of receiving ones jott. For the amount of time I've been jotting, I've only encountered bad transcriptions my first month, after that, my jotts have came back to me perfect! So I hope who ever reads this doesn't put a harsh judgement toward's Jott. Both are excellent services giving us the power of voice to text, but both for different reasons. :) Being a jott user for quite some time and studying braincast, I can say it isn’t really fair to compare the two when it comes to how it transcribes the voice. I can see how braincast can get better transcriptions because they have more time to get the trascriptions right being the person isn’t at their computer when they send it in. With Jott, you are requesting a transcription of the voice to be sent not only to email, but to one’s cell phone (or your own cell phone) and when doing so, it is more of an immediate command.

Second of all, if a jott transcription does get botched up, there is the option to hear the audio from your phone or email. So regardless, there is a way of receiving ones jott.

For the amount of time I’ve been jotting, I’ve only encountered bad transcriptions my first month, after that, my jotts have came back to me perfect! So I hope who ever reads this doesn’t put a harsh judgement toward’s Jott. Both are excellent services giving us the power of voice to text, but both for different reasons. :)

]]>